The programme allows us to come up with different innovative and creative ways to solve a problem. It also allows us to train our "quick-thinking" skills.Khimcn2yk: Casandra, YanJin, Nadiah, Nur Nadiah and KhimChallenge: Triple Take
The program should have more varieties of techinal challenges of diffrent difficulties as this challenge was still qyite hard and challenging to accomplish by our standards.GavinJin HaoNiloyBrandonGregory
Strengths: The challenges were interesting and doable, the topic of the instant challenge is unrelated to the item given, giving it a higher difficulty level.Weaknesses: The time given for this project is too short, the challenges have different difficulty levels, while some seems to be easier than the otherChallenge C: Casandra, Yan Jin, Nadiah, Nur Nadiah and Khim
Strengths: The challenges were very interesting and unique. It forces my group members and I to think out of the box and fit things that are totally unrelated together. Weaknesses: The time to prepare for this project is quite short. If it was longer, my group members and I would have done a better performance.~Challenge C~Casandra, Yan Jin, Nadiah, Yan Jin and Khim
Strengths: The challenge was feasible and engaging. It makes my team to bond more and test our skills of creativity and critical thinking; out of the box.Weakness: We did not fully use our time to complete the challenge.
no, no comment.
Strengths: The challenge was fun as we could think of creative and sometimes crazy ideas for our challenge.Weaknesses: We should have been given a bit more time to complete our challenge as we had other projects and homework that we were busy with.Challenge CGroup members: KJ Shakti, Lucas Chia, Wei Chern, Vivek, Elijah Wong